Wright v. Payne
| Noah Douglas Wright |
| Dexter Payne |
| 4:2023cv00597 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Patricia S Harris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Respondent Dexter Payne has filed the pending motion for extension of time. In the motion, he seeks additional time to file a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Noah Douglas Wright. For good cause shown, the motion is granted. Respondent is given up to, and including, September 4, 2023, to file his response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 08/14/2023. (jfc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne (Jackson, Adam) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Donner Jackson on behalf of Dexter Payne (Jackson, Adam) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to serve by regular mail a copy of #1 Wright's petition and this Order on respondent Dexter Payne and the Attorney General for the State of Arkansas; and directing the Respondent to file an answer, motion, or other response to Wright's petition conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts within 21 days after service of the petition, exclusive of the day of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 07/28/2023. (llg)
|
| Filing 3 Filing Fee Received: $5, Receipt Number LIT2889. (ajj) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Wright to either pay the filing fee or obtain permission to proceed in forma pauperis before his petition can be served; giving him up to, and including, 08/14/2023, to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send Wright the documents necessary to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In the event Wright fails to comply with the terms of this Order, it will be recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 07/13/2023. (llg)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Noah Douglas Wright. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wright v. Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Noah Douglas Wright | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dexter Payne | |
| Represented By: | Adam Donner Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
