Griffin v. Doe
| Trezon Griffin |
| Doe, Shane West, Anthony Lankford, Alicia Taylor and Conway County Detention Center |
| 4:2023cv00610 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Plaintiff's official capacity claims, access to the courts claims, conditions of confinement claims, religion-related claims, violation of Detention Center policy claim, and claims regarding a false disciplinary be dismissed without prejudice; recommending that the Conway County Detention Center, Shane West, and the Doe Defendants be dismissed as parties to this action; and recommending that Defendant Taylor, and Plaintiff's due process claim, be dismissed. Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/7/2023. (ldb) |
Filing 9
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare Summons for Defendant Lankford; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of #1 , #4 Complaint, Summons, and this Order on Defendant Lankford without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/7/2023. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 08/07/2023. (lmc)
|
| Summons Issued as to Anthony Lankford and forwarded to U.S. Marshal for service. (ldb) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk of the Court to forward a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Conway County Detention Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trezon Griffin. (ldb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying, without prejudice, #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Plaintiff to submit either the $402 statutory filing fee or a completed in forma pauperis application, with the required calculation sheet signed by an authorized official of the incarcerating facility, within 30 days of the entry date of this Order; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send to Plaintiff an in forma pauperis application, including certificate and calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/17/2023. (ldb)
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the description to "Amended Complaint." (kdr) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Trezon Griffin. (ldb) (Docket text modified on 7/14/2023 to correct the description of the document filed.) (kdr) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trezon Griffin. (ldb) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to submit either the $402 statutory filing fee or an In Forma Pauperis Motion within 30 days of the entry date of this Order; and directing the Clerk to send to Plaintiff an In Forma Pauperis Motion, together with the filing fee calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/6/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Doe filed by Trezon Griffin. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
