Huston v. Tri-Imaging Solutions
William Huston |
Tri-Imaging Solutions and Frontier Imaging Services |
4:2023cv00615 |
June 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Frontier Imaging Services.(Frase, John) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Frontier Imaging Services filed by William Huston.(ajj) |
Filing 5 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying as moot #2 motion for extension of time to answer. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/8/2023. (esn) |
Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 10/16/2023; Rule 26(f) Report due by 10/30/2023; Jury Trial proposed for sometime during the week of 2/10/2025 at 9:30 a.m. in Little Rock Courtroom #2D before Judge Brian S. Miller. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 8/7/2023. (ljb) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Tri-Imaging Solutions.(Frase, John) |
Filing 2 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Tri-Imaging Solutions (Frase, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Tri-Imaging Solutions, filed by William Huston. Filing Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT2700. Summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.