Huff v. Etherly et al
| Joshua Anthony Huff |
| Marcus I Etherly, Tyrone D Allison, Christopher Johnson and Moses Jackson |
| 4:2023cv00626 |
| July 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Patricia S Harris |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Summons by Joshua Anthony Huff. (llg) |
| Summons Reissued as to Marcus I Etherly and forwarded to the United States Marshal for service. (llg) |
Filing 10
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare a summons for defendant Etherly, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the #2 complaint, this order, and summons, upon him at the address under seal, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 8/28/2023. (jak)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to #4 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendation by Joshua Anthony Huff. (llg) |
| Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Marcus I Etherly. Address under Seal. (ajj) |
|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff Huff is granted an additional 30 days to file his response to the Recommended Disposition. Huff's response is due no later than August 28, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/27/2023. (cfd)
|
| Filing 6 ADDENDUM to #5 Motion for Extension of Deadline filed by Joshua Anthony Huff. (llg) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Deadline by Joshua Anthony Huff. (kdr) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND PARTIAL RECOMMENDATION recommending Huff's claims against Johnson, Allison, and Jackson be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 07/10/2023. (llg) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; assessing an initial partial filing fee of $2; directing the initial partial filing fee and monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's institutional account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Cummins Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office and to prepare a summons for Etherly; and directing the United States Marshal to serve a copy of #2 complaint, this order, and a summons, upon him without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. The Court will enter a separate recommendation concerning Huff's remaining claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 07/06/2023. (llg) (Docket text modified on 7/6/2023 to correct the description of the document filed)(jak)
|
| Summons Issued as to Marcus I Etherly and forwarded to the United States Marshal for service. (llg) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS" as marked on the document. (jak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joshua Anthony Huff.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Anthony Huff. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
