Chatman v. USA et al
| Tristian Chatman |
| USA and Arkansas, State of |
| 4:2023cv00641 |
| July 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Mr. Chatman must either (1) pay the statutory filing fee of $402.00; or (2) file a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required calculation sheet signed by an authorized official, within 30 days of entry of this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall send Mr. Chatman a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a filing fee calculation. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/30/2023. (jbh)
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document was filed in error - wrong case - due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. (kbc) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT for Class Action by Tristian Chatman. (kdr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tristian Chatman.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD (wrong case). (kdr) Docket text modified on 7/14/2023 to indicate filed in error. (kbc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
