Radford v. Jackson et al
| Tommy Radford |
| Moses Jackson, Johnson, T Allison, J Jones, Jenkins, Watson, J Louis and Tyrone Allison |
| 4:2023cv00677 |
| July 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: On September 12, 2023, ADC Defendants Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison, and Jasmine Louis filed a motion to dismiss Mr. Radford's claims based on his status as a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g)and a brief in support #8 , #9 . Mr. Radford has a right to respond but is not required to do so. Mr. Radford is advised that if he fails to respond by October 2, 2023, the Court will rule on the motion without his input. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 09/12/2023. (smp)
|
| Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 Motion to Dismiss and Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status filed by Tyrone Allison, Moses Jackson, J Louis. (Cryer, Christine) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss and Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status by Tyrone Allison, Moses Jackson, J Louis (Cryer, Christine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Ann Cryer on behalf of Tyrone Allison, Moses Jackson, J Louis (Cryer, Christine) |
| Filing 6 PARTIAL RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending Mr. Radford's claims against Defendants in their official capacity be dismissed, without prejudice; recommending Mr. Radford's First Amendment access to the court claim, his due process claim, and his claim against Defendant Watson be dismissed, without prejudice; and recommending the Clerk be instructed to terminate Lieutenant Watson as a party Defendant. Objections due within 14 days of the date of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 8/18/2023. (jbh) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Mr. Radford's motion for leave to proceed IFP; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the EARU and the appropriate ADC offices; directing the Clerk to prepare summonses for Defendants Moses Jackson, Deputy Warden Johnson, Major Tyrone Allison, Commissary Supervisor J. Jones, Commissary Supervisor Jenkins, and Lieutenant Louis; and directing the USMS to serve each Defendant with a summons and copy of #1 complaint without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 8/18/2023. (kdr)
|
| Summons Issued as to Tyrone Allison, Moses Jackson, Jenkins, Johnson, J Jones, J Louis. Forwarded to USMS for service. (kdr) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tommy Radford. (llg) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk to enclose an IFP application, along with a copy of this Order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay a $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 7/24/2023. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (kdr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Tommy Radford.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
