Everett v. Ashley et al
| Christopher Everett |
| Ashley, Carter, Edwards and Meadows |
| 4:2023cv00681 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Clerk to mail Everett a 1983 complaint form that is labeled "Amended and Substituted Complaint;" and directing Everett to file, within 30 days of the date of this Order, an Amended and Substituted Complaint containing the facts described in this Order, which are necessary to support his claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/6/2023. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Plaintiff's IFP Motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's institutional account until a total of $350 has been paid; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Jail Administrator for the White County Detention Facility. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/6/2023. (kdr)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Everett. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Everett. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
