Hollis v. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency et al
| Kelly Ray Hollis, III |
| Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and Air Force Research Lab |
| 4:2023cv00731 |
| August 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Summons Returned Executed. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #4 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kelly Ray Hollis, III. Air Force Research Lab served on 8/29/2023. (bmd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/5/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kelly Ray Hollis, III. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency served on 8/15/2023. (fjg) |
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFFS. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/8/2023. (jak)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kelly Ray Hollis, III against All Defendants. (Fee $402, Receipt Number LIT3138.) Summons issued and returned to Plaintiff. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
