Smith v. Hollywood
Plaintiff: Sheila Smith
Defendant: Hollywood
Case Number: 4:2023cv00805
Filed: August 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Central Division Office
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2023 Filing 21 USCA JUDGMENT as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Sheila Smith. Appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed. (jbh)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER directing the Clerk to terminate Smith's #17 , #18 pending motions and forward them to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/25/2023. (jbh)
September 22, 2023 Filing 19 NOTICE by Sheila Smith. (jbh)
September 22, 2023 Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Sheila Smith. (jbh)
September 22, 2023 Filing 17 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Sheila Smith. (jbh)
September 14, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #14 Notification of Appeal and NOA Supplement, #15 Notice of Docket Correction. CORRECTION: The original document attached to docket entry #14 was attached in error (wrong case caption). The correct document was added to docket entry #14 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. The docket text for docket entry #15 was modified to indicate the notice of docket correction was filed in error. (jak)
September 14, 2023 Filing 15 DOCKET ENTRY FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD (kbc) (Docket text modified on 9/14/2023 to indicate the docket entry was filed in error) (jak)
September 14, 2023 Filing 14 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #13 Notice of Appeal. (jbh) Additional attachment added on 9/14/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct. (kbc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2023: #2 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
September 13, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Sheila Smith. (jbh)
September 13, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Sheila Smith. (jak)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #10 motion to appeal in forma pauperis; directing Ms. Smith to, within 30 days of this order's entry date, either pay to this Court the $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees or file, with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, a motion with an attached affidavit that complies with each mandate of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1); and directing Ms. Smith to file any future documents or pleadings related to her appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/13/2023. (jbh)
September 12, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Sheila Smith. (jbh)
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Sheila Smith. The Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format. (fcd)
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Sheila Smith. The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. A motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must include a completed copy of the attached "Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs" or an affidavit that shows in the same detail the Appellant's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by October 6, 2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. (fcd)
September 8, 2023 Filing 7 USCA Docketing Letter as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Sheila Smith. USCA Case Number 23-3044. (fcd)
September 8, 2023 Filing 6 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to Sheila Smith re #5 Notice of Appeal, #3 Order, #4 Judgment. (fcd)
September 8, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order and #4 Judgment, by Sheila Smith. (fcd)
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 Order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 08/30/2023. (llg)
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER dismissing this case; and finding as moot #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 08/30/2023. (llg)
August 30, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Hollywood filed by Sheila Smith. (llg)
August 30, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheila Smith. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Hollywood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hollywood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?