Wright Perrin v. Lott et al
| Amy Wright Perrin |
| Julian Lott, City of Camden and Camden, City of |
| 4:2023cv00880 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal-Family & Medical Leave Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) DOCKET NOTE: This case is assigned to the docket of United States District Chief Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore is now associated to this case due to the retirement of Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/2/2023. (jbh) |
Filing 13
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Perrin's lawyer has informally advised there is no objection to motion, Doc. #12 . It is therefore granted. Response due by 30 October 2023. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/17/2023. (slb)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Response to Motion to Transfer by Camden, City of, Julian Lott (Cowan, Sarah) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to establish linkage to #8 Motion to Transfer Case.(jak) |
| Filing 11 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #10 Remand to State Court and Response to Motion to Transfer filed by Amy Wright Perrin. (Sutter, Luther) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Response to #8 Motion to Transfer by Amy Wright Perrin (Sutter, Luther) (Docket text modified on 10/2/2023 to establish linkage) (jak) |
| Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 Transfer Case filed by Camden, City of, Julian Lott. (Cowan, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Transfer Case by Camden, City of, Julian Lott (Cowan, Sarah) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Complaint, #3 Answer, #4 Amended Complaint, #5 Answer, #6 Notice. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the party name as, "Camden, City of." (cmn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #6 Notice of Appearance. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (missing case number) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #6 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Cowan on behalf of City of Camden, Julian Lott. (ldb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/21/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Camden, Julian Lott. (ldb) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Amy Wright Perrin against City of Camden, Julian Lott. (ldb) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by City of Camden, Julian Lott. (ldb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Amy Wright Perrin against City of Camden, Julian Lott. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of Camden, Julian Lott from Ouachita County Circuit Court, case number 52CV-22-210-4. Fee $402, receipt number LIT3637. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) (Docket text modified on 9/21/2023 to correct a typographical error) (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
