Stanley v. McDermott
| Marsha Stanley |
| Teresa McDermott |
| 4:2023cv01033 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM / MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Teresa McDermott. (Rouse, John) |
| Filing 6 Opposition in RESPONSE to #5 Brief in Support and #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM / MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Marsha Stanley. (fjg) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Teresa McDermott. (Rouse, John) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM /, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction () by Teresa McDermott (Rouse, John) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Teresa McDermott served on 11/6/2023. (ajj) |
| (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) DOCKET NOTE: This case is assigned to the docket of United States District Judge James M. Moody Jr. Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore is now associated to this case due to the retirement of Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/2/2023. (jbh) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to issue summons and return it along with a copy of #1 complaint to Plaintiff to complete service; and giving notice to Plaintiff the Court will dismiss this action unless proof of service is filed on or before Tuesday, 01/30/2024, or Plaintiff establishes good cause for the failure to serve summons and complaint on the Defendant within 90 days after filing the complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/01/2023. (llg)
|
| Summons Issued as to Teresa McDermott and mailed to Plaintiff for service. (llg) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the parties and description as, "COMPLAINT against Teresa McDermott, filed by Marsha Stanley" as indicated by the document. (cmn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Teresa McDermott, filed by Marsha Stanley. No summons issued. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT4067.) (ajj) (Docket text modified on 11/1/2023 to correct description.)(cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stanley v. McDermott | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marsha Stanley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Teresa McDermott | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Rouse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
