Jones v. Peterson et al
Brandon M Jones |
Rebekah Peterson, Benjamin Martin, Jason Gardner and Kelly Aunspaugh |
4:2023cv01069 |
November 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 E-MAIL received from U.S. District Court Western District of Arkansas, confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 6:23-cv-06116. (jak) |
Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk to immediately transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 11/15/2023. (llg) |
Docket Note: Case electronically transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas on this date. (llg) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION in Support of #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel, filed by Brandon M Jones. (ldb) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel, filed by Brandon M Jones. (ldb) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brandon M Jones. (ldb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Brandon M Jones. (ldb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon M Jones. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.