Worthen v. Chi St Vincent Infirmary
Plaintiff: Joan Worthen
Defendant: Chi St. Vincent Infirmary and Chi St Vincent Infirmary
Case Number: 4:2023cv01077
Filed: November 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Central Division Office
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to #2 Complaint Under Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 by Chi St Vincent Infirmary.(Kim, Jane)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jane A. Kim on behalf of Chi St Vincent Infirmary (Kim, Jane)
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joan Worthen. Chi St Vincent Infirmary served with summons and complaint on 12/22/2023. (jap)
December 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to issue summons and return it along with a copy of #2 complaint to Plaintiff to complete service; and giving Plaintiff notice the Court will dismiss this action unless proof of service is filed on or before Wednesday, 03/13/2024, or Plaintiff establishes good cause for the failure to serve summons and complaint on the Defendant within 90 days after filing the complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/14/2023. (llg)
December 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Chi St Vincent Infirmary and mailed to Plaintiff for service. (llg)
December 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Filing fee received. Amount: $402.00, Receipt # LIT4617. (fjg)
November 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directing Worthen to within 30 days from the date of this Order to pay the filing fee of $402.00. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/16/2023. (jak)
November 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER provisionally granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, pursuant to General Order No. 29. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/15/2023. (ajj)
November 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Chi St. Vincent Infirmary, filed by Joan Worthen. (ajj)
November 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joan Worthen. (ajj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Worthen v. Chi St Vincent Infirmary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joan Worthen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chi St. Vincent Infirmary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chi St Vincent Infirmary
Represented By: Jane A. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?