Smith et al v. Gelco Fleet Trust et al
| David Smith and Kim Smith |
| Gelco Fleet Trust and Thomas Daniel Perrow |
| 4:2023cv01112 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 2/5/2024; Rule 26(f) Report due by 2/20/2024; Jury Trial proposed for sometime during the week of 5/12/2025 at 9:30 a.m. in Little Rock Courtroom #2D before Judge Brian S. Miller. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/27/2023. (ljb) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Thomas Daniel Perrow.(Wilson, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Gelco Fleet Trust.(Wilson, Kyle) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Gelco Fleet Trust. (ajj) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by David Smith, Kim Smith. (ajj) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-23-7690. Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT4369. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ajj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
