Stapleton v. Doe
Plaintiff: Garry Stapleton
Defendant: Doe
Case Number: 4:2023cv01124
Filed: November 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Jerome T Kearney
Referring Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER directing the Plaintiff to submit an Amended Complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order; and directing the Clerk of the Court to mail Plaintiff a blank 1983 form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/4/2024. (ldb)
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 IFP Motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk of the Court to forward a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the White County Detention Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/27/2023. (jbh)
December 21, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Garry Stapleton. (csf)
December 18, 2023 Filing 6 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #5 Plaintiff's Motion for Amicus Brief and Relief DENIED. Objections are due to be received by the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/18/2023. (lmc) (Docket text modified on 12/18/2023 to correct description pursuant to instruction from Chambers.)(cmn)
December 18, 2023 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified as follows, "PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #5 Plaintiff's Motion for Amicus Brief and Relief DENIED. Objections are due to be received by the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/18/2023."(cmn)
December 8, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Amicus Brief and Relief by Garry Stapleton. (llg)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Plaintiff to submit either the $402 statutory filing fee or an In Forma Pauperis Motion within 30 days of the entry date of this Order; and directing the Clerk to send to Plaintiff an In Forma Pauperis Motion, together with the filing fee calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/29/2023. (ldb)
November 27, 2023 Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint filed by Garry Stapleton. (llg)
November 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
November 24, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Doe, filed by Garry Stapleton. (ldb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stapleton v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garry Stapleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?