Newsome v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
| LaVita Newsome |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation and Internal Revenue Service |
| 4:2023cv01133 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ldb) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT: Newsome's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/8/2024. (ldb) |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, #1 Complaint. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/8/2024. (ldb)
|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to LaVita Newsome re #1 Complaint. (fjg) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to LaVita Newsome re #2 Order. (ajj) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Newsom to pay the filing and administrative fees ($402) or file an application to proceed informa pauperis; and directing the Clerk to mail Newsom an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a blank 1983 form. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/28/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by LaVita Newsome. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
