Ashlock v. Social Security Administration
| Joshua Ashlock |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2024cv00035 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Benecia B Moore |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff must file a brief in support of the allegations in the Complaint on or before 4/5/2024. Defendant must file a brief within 30 days of the date Plaintiff's brief is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore on 3/7/2024. (kdr)
|
| Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT of proceedings re #2 Complaint filed by Social Security Administration (Preston, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Preston on behalf of Social Security Administration (Preston, Sarah) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney David B. Goetz is hereby admitted to the bar of this Court for the limited purpose of appearing in this case as counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore on 1/25/2024. (sls)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by David B. Goetz. Fee $100 receipt number CAREDC-4678323. Filed by Joshua Ashlock (Goetz, David) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying as moot #1 Plaintiff Joshua Ashlock's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and granting #3 David B. Goetz's petition for pro hac vice admission, with the condition that he designate local counsel or request a waiver of this requirement within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore on 1/22/2024. (kdr)
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to include, "Filing fee $405 paid, receipt number LIT4991." (cmn) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by David B. Goetz. Fee $100 receipt number LIT4992. Filed by Joshua Ashlock. (jbh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Joshua Ashlock. Filing fee $405 paid, receipt number LIT4991. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) (Docket text modified on 1/19/2024 to include filing fee paid.) (cmn) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Ashlock. (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ashlock v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua Ashlock | |
| Represented By: | David B. Goetz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Shannon S. Smith |
| Represented By: | Sarah Preston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
