Maskell v. Kemp et al
| Adam Maskell |
| John Dan Kemp, Cody Hiland, Courtney Hudson, Barbara Webb, Shawn A Womack, Karen R Baker and Rhonda K Wood |
| 4:2024cv00037 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #6 order entered today, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/23/2024. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER dismissing this case sua sponte; and denying as moot #1 Maskell's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/23/2024. (ljb)
|
| Filing 5 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on 4 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Brian S. Miller. (jak) |
|
Filing 4
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER OF RECUSAL. I recuse. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/23/2024. (hml)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Adam Maskell against All Defendants. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam Maskell. (Copy mailed.) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
