Scott v. US Department of Agriculture
| Gene Edward Scott, II |
| US Department of Agriculture |
| 4:2024cv00049 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Gene Edward Scott, II: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 4/1/2024, an order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (jbh)
|
| Filing 9 USCA Docketing Letter as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Gene Edward Scott, II. USCA Case Number 24-1503. (jbh) |
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #7 Notice of Appeal re #3 Order, #4 Judgment. (jbh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order, #4 Judgment by Gene Edward Scott, II. (jbh) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER finding as moot #5 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss since this case was dismissed on January 24, 2024. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 02/06/24. (dmm)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Gene Edward Scott, II. (jap) |
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Based on the #3 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 1/24/2024. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing this case; finding moot #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and directing the Clerk of the Court to no longer accept complaints from Plaintiff unless he pays the filing fee. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 1/24/2024. (jbh)
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket entries were modified to correct the file date as 1/22/2024 as marked on the documents. (jak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against US Department of Agriculture, filed by Gene Edward Scott, II. (jbh)(Docket entry modified on 1/23/2024 to correct the file date) (jak) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gene Edward Scott, II. (jbh) (Docket entry modified on 1/23/2024 to correct the file date) (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. US Department of Agriculture | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gene Edward Scott, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: US Department of Agriculture | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
