Galloway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
James Galloway, IV |
Union Pacific Railroad Company |
4:2024cv00136 |
February 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 6/24/2025 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #1D before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Motions to Amend and Join Other Parties due by 12/26/2024; Discovery due by 1/24/2025; Motions due by 2/24/2025; Status Report due by 2/24/2025; and Pretrial Disclosure Sheet due by 5/26/2025. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 4/3/2024. (hml) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (McCarroll, Mary) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 Answer and #6 Notice of Appearance. CORRECTION: The docket text for docket entry #3 was modified to include reference to the Jury demand as marked on the document. The docket text for docket entry #6 was modified to correct the attorney entering appearance as Kathy McCarroll as marked on the document. (jak) |
Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/10/2024 and Jury Trial set for 6/10/2025 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #1D before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 3/20/2024. (hml) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathy McCarroll on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company (Tucker, Scott) (Docket text modified on 3/21/2024 to correct the attorney entering appearance) (jak) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott H. Tucker on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company (Tucker, Scott) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Tucker, Scott) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Tucker, Scott) (Docket text modified on 3/21/2024 to include reference to the Jury demand) (jak) |
Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad Company and returned to counsel for plaintiff. (jap) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by James Galloway, IV against Union Pacific Railroad Company. ( Fee $405, Receipt Number LIT5341.) No summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Galloway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Galloway, IV | |
Represented By: | Nelson Gregory Wolff |
Represented By: | Paul J. James |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
Represented By: | Mary Kathleen McCarroll |
Represented By: | Scott H. Tucker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.