Self et al v. Cadence Bank
Plaintiff: Joseph Self and Malinda Self
Defendant: Cadence Bank
Case Number: 4:2024cv00142
Filed: February 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2024 Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Stay all Proceedings or, in the Alternative, to Extend Deadlines by Joseph Self, Malinda Self (Pulliam, Randall)
March 6, 2024 Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 Remand to State Court filed by Joseph Self, Malinda Self. (Pulliam, Randall)
March 6, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Joseph Self, Malinda Self (Pulliam, Randall)
February 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/27/2024. (hml)
February 26, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Lynn Toops. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4699464. Filed by Joseph Self, Malinda Self (Pulliam, Randall)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Response due by 3/25/2024. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/20/2024. (hml)
February 16, 2024 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Cadence Bank (Koehler, David)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
February 16, 2024 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Cadence Bank. (ldb)
February 16, 2024 Filing 2 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Joseph Self and Malinda Self against Cadence Bank. (ldb)
February 16, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cadence Bank from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-24-354. Fee $405, receipt number LIT5345. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Self et al v. Cadence Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Self
Represented By: Randall Keith Pulliam
Represented By: Lynn A. Toops
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malinda Self
Represented By: Randall Keith Pulliam
Represented By: Lynn A. Toops
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cadence Bank
Represented By: David Koehler
Represented By: Lyn Peeples Pruitt
Represented By: Isabelle Louise Ord
Represented By: Joseph Trumon Phillips
Represented By: Austin K. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?