Lockhart v. Petty et al
Reginald D Lockhart |
Eric Petty, Kenneth Wilcox and Little Rock, City of |
4:2024cv00143 |
February 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 5/16/2024; Rule 26(f) Report due by 5/30/2024. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 5/12/2025 at 9:15 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4A before Judge James M. Moody Jr.Signed at the Direction of the Court on 4/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lynette Boggs-Perez on behalf of All Defendants (Boggs-Perez, Lynette) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas M. Carpenter on behalf of All Defendants (Carpenter, Thomas) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Little Rock, City of, Eric Petty, Kenneth Wilcox.(Pritchard, Cody) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody Pritchard on behalf of All Defendants (Pritchard, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Reginald D Lockhart. (Filing Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT5351.) Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.