Doe v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc et al
| John Doe |
| G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc and Rite of Passage |
| 4:2024cv00149 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 5/6/2024. Jury Trial set for 10/5/2026 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom #1A before Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Signed at the direction of the Court on 3/13/2024. (slb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Tony A. DiCarlo, III on behalf of Rite of Passage (DiCarlo, Tony) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Rite of Passage.(DiCarlo, Tony) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.(ajj) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. (ajj) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by John Doe. (ajj) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc from Saline County Circuit Court, case number 63CV-24-85-3. Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT5375. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ajj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
