Thompson v. Bank of America NA
| Marcus Thompson |
| Bank of America NA |
| 4:2024cv00157 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying without prejudice #7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or for a More Definite Statement, based on Plaintiff's amended complaint. If Defendant believes issues remain, it may refile the motion raising the specific issues. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 04/15/24. (dmm)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT filed by Marcus Thompson. (Crabtree, Danny) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bank of America NA, filed by Marcus Thompson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Crabtree, Danny) |
| Filing 8 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #7 Motion to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT filed by Bank of America NA. (Henry, Judy) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT by Bank of America NA (Henry, Judy) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Defendant's unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Accordingly, Defendant's answer or responsive pleading must be filed by 5 p.m., Monday, April 1, 2024. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 02/26/24. (dmm)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Bank of America NA (Henry, Judy) |
| Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 5/1/2024. Rule 26(f) Report due by 5/15/2024. Jury Trial set for 2/25/2025 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 2/22/24. (mmb) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Bank of America NA. (jbh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTING with Jury Demand against Bank of America NA, filed by Marcus Thompson. (jbh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bank of America NA from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-24-00475. Fee of $405 paid; receipt number LIT5393. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. Bank of America NA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marcus Thompson | |
| Represented By: | Danny R. Crabtree |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bank of America NA | |
| Represented By: | Judy Simmons Henry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
