Brooks v. Boyd et al
Rohan Brooks |
Brandon Boyd and One Gone Transport LLC |
4:2024cv00218 |
March 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 5/6/2024. Jury Trial set for 10/5/2026 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 1A before Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Signed at the direction of the Court on 3/13/2024. (slb) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by One Gone Transport LLC (Buckley, Mary) |
Filing 4 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #3 Answer notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (jak) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Brandon Boyd, One Gone Transport LLC. (ajj) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Rohan Brooks. (ajj) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Prairie County Circuit Court, case number 59SCV-24-03. Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT5585. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ajj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.