Garcia v. PepsiCo Inc et al
Dyleen Garcia |
Does John Does 1-3 and John Doe Entities 1-3 and Grayhawk Leasing LLC |
4:2024cv00711 |
August 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Billy Roy Wilson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #15 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Adam D. Franks is terminated. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/20/24. (mmb) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Grayhawk Leasing LLC by Grayhawk Leasing LLC (Franks, Adam) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Emerson on behalf of Grayhawk Leasing LLC (Emerson, Michael) |
Filing 13 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #12 the Joint Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, PepsiCo, Inc. and Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 09/18/24. (dmm) |
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION for Dismissal without Prejudice by Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Inc, PepsiCo Inc. (Franks, Adam) (Docket text modified on 9/17/2024 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #12 Stipulation of Dismissal. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "Joint STIPULATION for Dismissal without Prejudice by Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Inc, PepsiCo Inc" pursuant to instruction from the filing attorney and as marked on the document. (jak) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Grayhawk Leasing LLC, Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Inc, PepsiCo Inc.(Franks, Adam) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Grayhawk Leasing LLC (Franks, Adam) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Dyleen Garcia. (Docketed pursuant to instruction from Chambers.)(cmn) |
Filing 8 Amended Petition for Removal by Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Inc, PepsiCo Inc re #1 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL EX A, #2 Exhibit AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL EX B)(Franks, Adam) |
Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 10/29/2024. Rule 26(f) Report due by 11/12/2024. Jury Trial set for 9/30/2025 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 8/21/24. (mmb) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Inc (Franks, Adam) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by PepsiCo Inc (Franks, Adam) |
Filing 4 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #1 Notice of Removal notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (jbh) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Inc, PepsiCo Inc. (jbh) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Dyleen Garcia. (jbh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Inc, PepsiCo Inc from Cleburne County Circuit Court, case number 12CV-24-00171. Fee of $405 paid; receipt number LIT7557. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.