Dunahue v. Payne et al
| Reginald L Dunahue |
| Marshall Reed, Willam Straughn, Michael Richardson, B Davis, Dexter Payne and Moses Jackson, III |
| 4:2024cv00739 |
| August 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Benecia B Moore |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment by Reginald L Dunahue. (ajj) |
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice #5 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore on 10/4/2024. (kdr)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Reginald L Dunahue. (ldb) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT by Reginald L Dunahue. (ajj) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 IFP Motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the East Arkansas Regional Unit and the appropriate ADC Offices. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore on 9/4/2024. (ldb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Reginald L Dunahue. (ajj) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Reginald L Dunahue. (ajj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
