Bradford v. Konadle et al
| Joshua Bradford |
| Kathren Shuler, Mike Konadle, Brieann Estes and Mallory Ledbetter |
| 4:2024cv00861 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ljb) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/5/2024. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing this case without prejudice because Joshua Bradford has failed to comply with #2 order directing him to pay the full filing fee or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/5/2024. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed, signed IFP application or pay the $405.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 10/10/2024. (llg)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joshua Bradford. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
