Davis v. Singh et al
Plaintiff: Collars W Davis
Defendant: Saquinn Lee, Jimmiesha Palmer, Amritpal Singh and Jason Boykin
Case Number: 4:2024cv00867
Filed: October 10, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Billy Roy Wilson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE by Collars W Davis. (Docketed pursuant to 2 Order in 4:24-cv-00988-BRW) (jbh) (Docket text modified on 11/15/2024 to correct a typographical error)(jak)
October 25, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE by Collars W Davis. (ajj)
October 24, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE by Collars W Davis. (llg)
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 request to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the W.C. Brassell Adult Detention Center; administratively terminating this case; allowing Mr. Davis to move to reopen this case after final disposition of his state case, including any appeal, within sixty days of that final disposition; and directing the Clerk's Office to mail Mr. Davis blank forms should he decide to pursue separate charges arising from the events described in the #3 Notice. If Mr. Davis does not file a timely motion to reopen or a status report by 10/21/2025, the Court will reopen the case and dismiss it without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/22/2024. (jbh)
October 10, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE by Collars W Davis. (ajj)
October 10, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Collars W Davis. (ajj)
October 10, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Collars W Davis. (ajj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Singh et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saquinn Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmiesha Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amritpal Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Boykin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Collars W Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?