Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Griffin et al
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation |
| Tim Griffin, Rodney Richmond, Debbie Mack, Brian Jolly, Lenora Newsome, Clint Boone, Lyn Fruchey, Harold Simpson and Beth Ann Davenport |
| 4:2025cv00633 |
| June 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE of Hearing Rescheduled on #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and #18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim: Motion Hearing reset for 1/20/2026 at 10:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom 1D before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (hml) |
| Filing 32 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE of Rescheduling Hearing: Telephone Conference reset for 1/7/2026 at 9:00 AM before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (hml) |
| Filing 31 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE of Hearing: Telephone Conference set for 12/10/2025 at 8:45 AM before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (hml) |
| Filing 30 REPLY to Response to Motion re #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of John Kirtley)(Purvis, Laura) |
Filing 29
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #28 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of #18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 9/18/2025. (hml)
|
| Filing 28 MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss by All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Document Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Purvis, Laura) |
| Filing 27 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE of Hearing on #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and #18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim: Motion Hearing set for 12/17/2025 at 9:00 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom 1D before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (hml) |
|
Filing 26
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #25 Unopposed Motion to Extend the Time to File a Reply to #18 Motion to Dismiss. Reply due by 9/17/2025. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 9/10/2025. (hml)
|
| Filing 25 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim by All Defendants (Purvis, Laura) |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim, #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOVARTISS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Neal, Emily) |
|
Filing 23
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #22 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's consolidated response to #18 Motion to Dismiss and reply to #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction due by September 3, 2025. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 8/26/2025. (hml)
|
| Filing 22 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim, #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, #19 Response in Opposition to Motion by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Neal, Emily) |
|
Filing 21
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #20 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's consolidated response to #18 Motion to Dismiss and reply to #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction due by August 27, 2025. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 8/12/2025. (hml)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Extend Time by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Eldridge, William) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by All Defendants. (Purvis, Laura) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim by All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Order Denying the Request for a TRO, #2 Act 630, #3 Study on Impact of Limited Distribution Networks, #4 Adam Head Declaration)(Purvis, Laura) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura L. Purvis on behalf of All Defendants (Purvis, Laura) |
|
Filing 16
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jacob T. Young. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/15/2025. (hml)
|
|
Filing 15
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Marlan J. Golden. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/15/2025. (hml)
|
|
Filing 14
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Aleksander V. Sverdlov. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/15/2025. (hml)
|
|
Filing 13
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jessica L. Ellsworth. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/15/2025. (hml)
|
|
Filing 12
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Susan M. Cook. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/15/2025. (hml)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Jacob T. Young. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4996640. Filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Neal, Emily) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Marlan J. Golden. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4996628. Filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Neal, Emily) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Aleksander V. Sverdlov. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4996623. Filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Neal, Emily) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Jessica L. Ellsworth. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4996601. Filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Neal, Emily) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Susan M. Cook. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4996589. Filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Neal, Emily) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Joint Motion for a Briefing Schedule. Response due by 8/6/2025 and Reply due by 8/27/2025. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/11/2025. (hml)
|
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Order for Briefing Schedule by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Neal, Emily) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (ldb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation against All Defendants. (Fee $405, Receipt Number LIT11035.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
