Stanley v. Drew County Detention Facility Center et al
Plaintiff: Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr
Defendant: Drew County Detention Facility Center, Jackson and Does Jail Doctor, Jail Workers, and Day and Night Shift Workers, Drew County Detention Center Facility Center
Case Number: 4:2025cv00902
Filed: September 3, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2026 Filing 25 MANDATE of USCA in accordance with the judgment of 1/23/2026 as to 10 Notice of Appeal filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (jbh)
January 23, 2026 Filing 24 USCA JUDGMENT as to 10 Notice of Appeal filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr: The motion for leave to proceed on appeal is denied and the appeal is hereby dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or to demonstrate eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (ldb)
November 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #22 Motion for Order. This motion should be filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/24/25. (dpb)
November 17, 2025 Filing 22 MOTION for Appeal Status Update by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (jbh)
November 3, 2025 Filing 21 NOTICE by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (jbh)
October 31, 2025 Filing 20 NOTICE by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (jbh)
October 31, 2025 Filing 19 NOTICE by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (jbh)
October 16, 2025 Filing 18 NOTICE by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (ldb)
October 16, 2025 Filing 17 NOTICE by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (ldb)
October 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER of USCA as to 10 Notice of Appeal filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr: Appellant is directed to either pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the full appellate docketing fee of $605, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, and submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. If Appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order with required pleading and motion within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 11/10/2025. (jbh)
October 10, 2025 Filing 15 NOTICE by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (jbh)
October 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The Court has previously certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would be frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/9/2025. (dpb)
October 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER of USCA as to 10 Notice of Appeal filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr: The Clerk of the district court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER. (jbh)
October 1, 2025 Filing 12 USCA Docketing Letter as to 10 Notice of Appeal filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. USCA Case Number 25-2926. (jbh)
September 30, 2025 Filing 11 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to 10 Notice of Appeal re #6 Order, #7 Judgment. (jbh)
September 29, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order, #7 Judgment by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (No separate document filed; see docket entry #9 .) (jbh)
September 29, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (jbh)
September 16, 2025 Filing 8 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ldb)
September 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #6 order, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice; the relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/16/2025. (ldb)
September 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER approving and adopting #3 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying #1 IFP Motion; dismissing, without prejudice, #2 Complaint; directing Plaintiff to submit the statutory filing and administrative fee of $405.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 15 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case, if he wishes to continue this case; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/16/2025. (ldb)
September 12, 2025 Filing 5 OBJECTION to #3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (ldb)
September 10, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (ajj)
September 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied; recommending #2 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice; recommending that if Plaintiff wishes to continue this case, he be required to submit the statutory filing and administrative fee of $405.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 15 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case; and recommending that the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/4/2025. (ldb) (Docket text modified on 9/5/2025 to correct typographical error.) (jbh)
September 3, 2025 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (ajj)
September 3, 2025 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr. (ajj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanley v. Drew County Detention Facility Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drew County Detention Facility Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does Jail Doctor, Jail Workers, and Day and Night Shift Workers, Drew County Detention Center Facility Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?