Johnson v. Payne
| John Ellis Johnson |
| Dexter Payne |
| 4:2025cv01034 |
| October 2, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by John Ellis Johnson. (llg) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Order by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
| Filing 17 OBJECTION to #7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Order by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Order by John Ellis Johnson. (ajs) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John Ellis Johnson. (ajj) |
| Filing 12 OBJECTIONS to #7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
| Filing 11 OBJECTIONS to #7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
| Filing 10 OBJECTION to #7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, by John Ellis Johnson. (ajj) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to #7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, by John Ellis Johnson. (ajj) |
| Filing 8 OBJECTION to #7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, by John Ellis Johnson. (ajj) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Mr. Johnson's 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed without prejudice #2 . A certificate of appealability should not be issued. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/15/2025. (lej) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Service is not appropriate at this time. The Clerk shall amend the docket to substitute Dexter Payne as the respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/14/2025. (lej)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 Notice. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (lack of file mark) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #3 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2025: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Ellis Johnson. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Ellis Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dexter Payne | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
