Bolden v. Central Arkansas Library et al
| Brian Bolden |
| Central Arkansas Library, Lora Allen, Sean Ragan and Does Police Department |
| 4:2026cv00400 |
| April 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #5 Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to include the jury demand and correct the description as follows, "AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Brian Bolden." (cmn) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Brian Bolden. (jap) (Docket text modified on 5/5/2026 to include jury demand and correct description.) (cmn) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Bolden. (jap) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; allowing Bolden 30 days to file an amended complaint; and directing the Clerk to provide Bolden a blank 1983 complaint along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/23/2026. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Brian Bolden against All Defendants. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Bolden. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
