McClendon v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
| Chelsa McClendon |
| LVNV Funding LLC and Resurgent Capital Services |
| 4:2026cv00519 |
| May 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Default Judgment against All Defendants filed by Resurgent Capital Services. (Morris, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Default Judgment against All Defendants filed by Chelsa McClendon. (fjg) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION to Clerk for Entry of Default filed by Chelsa McClendon. (fjg) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Chelsa McClendon. All Defendants served on 5/29/2026. (fjg) |
| Filing 4 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #3 Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Resurgent Capital Services. (Morris, Samuel) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Resurgent Capital Services (Morris, Samuel) |
Filing 2
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Chelsa McClendon against All Defendants. (Fee $405, Receipt Number LIT14680.) Summons issued and returned to Plaintiff. (Copy mailed.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
