Shutes v. Breedlove et al
| Travis Shutes |
| Breedlove and WellPath |
| 4:2026cv00548 |
| May 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #10 Recommended Disposition by Travis Shutes. (llg) |
Filing 10
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that the #1 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a plausible claim for relief. In the future, dismissal be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order adopting this recommendation and the accompany judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 7/8/2026. (lej)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #5 #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the Larry B. Norris Unit Warden, ADC Trust Bank, and ADC Compliance Office. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 7/8/2026. (lej)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Shutes. (ldb) |
|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER that the Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a Calculation Sheet. Plaintiff must, within 30 days of the date of this order, either: (a) pay the full $405 filing fee; or (b) file a properly completed Calculation Sheet. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 7/1/2026. (lej)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court by Travis Shutes. (ajs) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Shutes. (llg) |
|
Filing 4
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered Plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that Plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the Plaintiff's ability to investigate and present his case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that Plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears he is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel. Denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/9/2026. (lej)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the Clerk shall mail Plaintiff an IFP Motion and a Calculation Sheet. Plaintiff must, within 30 days of the date of this order, either: (a) pay the full $405 filing fee; or (b) file a properly completed IFP Motion and Calculation Sheet. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/9/2026. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Shutes. (llg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Travis Shutes. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
