Ashley v. Nash et al
| Ricky Ashley |
| Rick D Nash, Kristine G Baker, D P Marshall, Jr, Briant S Miller, James M Moody, Jr, Lee P Rudofsky, Susan Webber Wright, Beth Deere, Patricia S Harris, Jerome T Kearney, Benecia B Moore, J Thomas Ray, Joe J Volpe, Albert Diaz, James A Wynn, Robert B King, Allison Jones Rushing, Brittany Dicken, Andre Brrello, Julice Gatkay, Jennifer M Faunce and Does Active Arkansas Federal Judges |
| 4:2026cv00726 |
| July 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Ricky Ashley. (Docketed pursuant to #1 Order.) (ldb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ricky Ashley. (ldb) |
Filing 1
ORDER directing the Clerk to open a separate lawsuit for Plaintiff Ricky Ashley assigned to United States District Judge Lee P. Rudofsky and United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 7/16/2026. (Originally docketed in 4:26-cv-00706-LPR-ERE.) (ldb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.