B & H Asphalt Paving v. David Boland Inc, et al
Plaintiff: B & H Asphalt Paving Inc
Defendant: David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2002cv00031
Filed: January 25, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER (DOC) the Court has been advised that this case has settled, therefore the settlement conference scheduled before Magistrate Judge Forster on Monday, 2/23/04 is canceled (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
February 9, 2004 Filing 34 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by parties (tjj)
January 12, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody granting motion for attorney Denis L Durkin to appear pro hac vice [32-1] (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
December 30, 2003 Filing 32 MOTION by David Boland Inc for attorney Denis L Durkin to appear pro hac vice (bkj)
December 3, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 31 SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC) this case is scheduled for a settlement conference on Monday, 2/23/04 at 10:00 am before Judge Forster in Little Rock; the parties are directed to have those individuals available at the conference who have settlement authority (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
October 28, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER OF REFERRAL (DOC) this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Forster to conduct and schedule a settlement conference; the trial of the case is scheduled to commence on 3/22/04; a separate order setting forth the details of the conference will be issued by Judge Forster (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
October 22, 2003 Filing 29 AMENDED FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC); jury trial set for 9:15 am the week of 3/22/04 in Pine Bluff; discovery due 1/22/04; status report due 1/22/04; pretrial info sheet due 3/2/04 (cc: all counsel) (tjj) Modified on 10/23/2003
October 22, 2003 Docket Modification (Utility Event) finding the motion for continuance of the trial date [28-1] and the motion request for a revised scheduling order [28-2] moot due to the entry of an amended scheduling order. (mah)
October 20, 2003 Filing 28 MOTION by defendant for continuance of the trial date and request for a revised scheduling order (tjj)
September 18, 2003 Filing 27 JOINT STATUS REPORT by parties (2 day trial) (tjj)
March 7, 2003 Filing 26 AMENDED FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC); jury trial set for 9:15 am the week of 11/17/03 in Pine Bluff; discovery due by 1/9/03; pretrial info sheet due by 10/28/03 (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
March 6, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody denying deft's motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
March 5, 2003 Filing 24 CLERK'S MINUTES: HEARING (Ph.Cf.) on deft's. motion for summary judgment held before Judge James M. Moody. Motion taken under advisement. (Ct. Rep. -- Carolyn Fant) (mah)
February 19, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER (DOC) the Court hereby schedules a hearing by telephone conference for 9:30 am on Wednesday 3/5/03 at which time oral argument will be heard before final resolution of the motion (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
February 13, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER (DOC) it is ordered that attorney Travis J. Morrissey is substituted for David A. Grace as counsel of record for the pltf nunc pro tunc 7/8/02 (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
February 11, 2003 Filing 21 REPLY by defendants to response to motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bmt)
January 29, 2003 Filing 20 STATEMENT OF FACTS (Local Rule 56.1) by plaintiff in support of motion response [18-1] (bkj)
January 29, 2003 Filing 19 BRIEF by plaintiff in support of motion response [18-1] (bkj)
January 29, 2003 Filing 18 RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bkj)
January 17, 2003 Filing 17 STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS (Local Rule 56.1) by defendants in support of motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bkj)
January 17, 2003 Filing 16 BRIEF by defendants in support of motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bkj)
January 17, 2003 Filing 15 MOTION by defendants for final summary judgment (bkj)
October 22, 2002 Filing 14 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT by defendants and plaintiff (bkj)
September 20, 2002 Filing 13 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC); jury trial set for 9:15 am the week of 3/10/03 in Pine Bluff; discovery due by 1/9/03; pretrial info sheet due by 2/18/03 (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
July 8, 2002 Filing 12 MOTION by plaintiff to substitute attorney Travis J. Morrissey in place of David A. Grace (tjj) Modified on 07/10/2002
July 3, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody granting motion to withdraw attorney David A. Grace [10-1] as attorney for B & H Asphalt Paving (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
May 23, 2002 Filing 10 MOTION by plaintiff to withdraw attorney David A. Grace (bkj)
May 9, 2002 Filing 9 INTIAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC) Rule 26(f) conference to be held on or before 6/03/02; Rule 26(f) report will be due by 6/17/02; Rule 26(f) conference will be scheduled within one week of the filing of Rule 26(f) report (if needed); proposed trial date 3/10/03 (cc: all counsel) (bkj)
March 8, 2002 Filing 8 ANSWER to complaint by defendant American Insurance (bkj) Modified on 03/08/2002
March 8, 2002 Filing 7 ANSWER to complaint by David Boland Inc (bkj)
February 26, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody granting motion to extend time to answer [4-1] until 3/8/02 (cc: all counsel) (tjj)
February 21, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright Case reassigned to Judge James M. Moody (cc: all counsel) (vjt)
February 20, 2002 Filing 4 MOTION by defendant to extend time to answer or to extend time to respond (bkj)
February 1, 2002 Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant American Insurance on 1/29/02 by serving Terri Scott, Legal Division (former empl)
February 1, 2002 Filing 2 RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant American Insurance on 1/29/02 by serving the Arkansas Insurance Department (former empl)
January 25, 2002 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand; summons issued and returned to Attorney; $150.00 filing fee paid, receipt #100231 (former empl) Modified on 01/28/2002

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: B & H Asphalt Paving v. David Boland Inc, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: B & H Asphalt Paving Inc
Represented By: David A. Grace
Represented By: Travis J. Morrissey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Boland Inc
Represented By: Kristine Gerhard Baker
Represented By: E. B. Chiles, IV
Represented By: Denis L. Durkin
Represented By: John E. Tull, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Insurance Company
Represented By: John E. Tull, III
Represented By: E. B. Chiles, IV
Represented By: Kristine Gerhard Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?