B & H Asphalt Paving v. David Boland Inc, et al
B & H Asphalt Paving Inc |
David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company |
5:2002cv00031 |
January 25, 2002 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Miller Act |
40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER (DOC) the Court has been advised that this case has settled, therefore the settlement conference scheduled before Magistrate Judge Forster on Monday, 2/23/04 is canceled (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 34 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by parties (tjj) |
Filing 33 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody granting motion for attorney Denis L Durkin to appear pro hac vice [32-1] (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 32 MOTION by David Boland Inc for attorney Denis L Durkin to appear pro hac vice (bkj) |
Filing 31 SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC) this case is scheduled for a settlement conference on Monday, 2/23/04 at 10:00 am before Judge Forster in Little Rock; the parties are directed to have those individuals available at the conference who have settlement authority (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 30 ORDER OF REFERRAL (DOC) this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Forster to conduct and schedule a settlement conference; the trial of the case is scheduled to commence on 3/22/04; a separate order setting forth the details of the conference will be issued by Judge Forster (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 29 AMENDED FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC); jury trial set for 9:15 am the week of 3/22/04 in Pine Bluff; discovery due 1/22/04; status report due 1/22/04; pretrial info sheet due 3/2/04 (cc: all counsel) (tjj) Modified on 10/23/2003 |
Docket Modification (Utility Event) finding the motion for continuance of the trial date [28-1] and the motion request for a revised scheduling order [28-2] moot due to the entry of an amended scheduling order. (mah) |
Filing 28 MOTION by defendant for continuance of the trial date and request for a revised scheduling order (tjj) |
Filing 27 JOINT STATUS REPORT by parties (2 day trial) (tjj) |
Filing 26 AMENDED FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC); jury trial set for 9:15 am the week of 11/17/03 in Pine Bluff; discovery due by 1/9/03; pretrial info sheet due by 10/28/03 (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 25 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody denying deft's motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 24 CLERK'S MINUTES: HEARING (Ph.Cf.) on deft's. motion for summary judgment held before Judge James M. Moody. Motion taken under advisement. (Ct. Rep. -- Carolyn Fant) (mah) |
Filing 23 ORDER (DOC) the Court hereby schedules a hearing by telephone conference for 9:30 am on Wednesday 3/5/03 at which time oral argument will be heard before final resolution of the motion (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 22 ORDER (DOC) it is ordered that attorney Travis J. Morrissey is substituted for David A. Grace as counsel of record for the pltf nunc pro tunc 7/8/02 (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 21 REPLY by defendants to response to motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bmt) |
Filing 20 STATEMENT OF FACTS (Local Rule 56.1) by plaintiff in support of motion response [18-1] (bkj) |
Filing 19 BRIEF by plaintiff in support of motion response [18-1] (bkj) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bkj) |
Filing 17 STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS (Local Rule 56.1) by defendants in support of motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bkj) |
Filing 16 BRIEF by defendants in support of motion for final summary judgment [15-1] (bkj) |
Filing 15 MOTION by defendants for final summary judgment (bkj) |
Filing 14 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT by defendants and plaintiff (bkj) |
Filing 13 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC); jury trial set for 9:15 am the week of 3/10/03 in Pine Bluff; discovery due by 1/9/03; pretrial info sheet due by 2/18/03 (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 12 MOTION by plaintiff to substitute attorney Travis J. Morrissey in place of David A. Grace (tjj) Modified on 07/10/2002 |
Filing 11 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody granting motion to withdraw attorney David A. Grace [10-1] as attorney for B & H Asphalt Paving (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 10 MOTION by plaintiff to withdraw attorney David A. Grace (bkj) |
Filing 9 INTIAL SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC) Rule 26(f) conference to be held on or before 6/03/02; Rule 26(f) report will be due by 6/17/02; Rule 26(f) conference will be scheduled within one week of the filing of Rule 26(f) report (if needed); proposed trial date 3/10/03 (cc: all counsel) (bkj) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to complaint by defendant American Insurance (bkj) Modified on 03/08/2002 |
Filing 7 ANSWER to complaint by David Boland Inc (bkj) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Judge James M. Moody granting motion to extend time to answer [4-1] until 3/8/02 (cc: all counsel) (tjj) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright Case reassigned to Judge James M. Moody (cc: all counsel) (vjt) |
Filing 4 MOTION by defendant to extend time to answer or to extend time to respond (bkj) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant American Insurance on 1/29/02 by serving Terri Scott, Legal Division (former empl) |
Filing 2 RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant American Insurance on 1/29/02 by serving the Arkansas Insurance Department (former empl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand; summons issued and returned to Attorney; $150.00 filing fee paid, receipt #100231 (former empl) Modified on 01/28/2002 |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.