Day v. Norris et al
5:2005cv00189 |
June 27, 2005 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
James M Moody |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Defendants May, Hobbs, Reed, Lay, Evans, White and Luckett and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, 1 Complaint, 6 Amended Complaint, and this Order upon those seven Defendants thro ugh the ADC Compliance Division, w/out prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Plaintiff shall file a Motion for Service containing the full names and service addresses for Defendant Food Service Administrator John Doe #1 and Defendant AD C Dietician John Doe #2, w/in 120 days of the entry of this Order. The Clerk is also directed to indicate on the docket sheet that Defendants Larry Norris, Mike Huckabee, and the Arkansas Board of Correction have been dismissed from this action pursuant to the Court's 11/4/2005 12 Order and 13 Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Thomas Ray on 3/22/2007. (smb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Day v. Norris et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.