Proctor v. Smallwood et al
5:2006cv00075 |
March 31, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
George Howard |
H. David Young |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 134 ORDER granting 133 Motion for Disbursement of Funds and ordering the Clerk to distribute to the appointed counsel the total amount of $1,583.83 from the Fund and to maintain a copy of this Order in the Fund file maintained by the Clerk of the Court and paid in full. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 7/15/09. (bkp) |
Filing 132 JUDGMENT in favor of Bonnie Smallwood, Ray Hobbs against Terry Proctor dismissing case with prejudice and denying the relief sought. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 3/23/09. (bkp) |
Filing 129 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Defts' 118 motion for summary judgment be GRANTED and Pltf's complaint 2 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; all pending motions be DENIED AS MOOT; Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 3/16/09. (vjt) (Docket text modified on 3/18/2009 to correct the deadline for Objection to the R&R, as set forth in the document.) (thd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Proctor v. Smallwood et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.