Lowry et al v. Watson Chapel School District et al
| 5:2006cv00262 |
| October 10, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
JUDGMENT re 119 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees; judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs against the defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $5607.17 plus post-judgment interest to accrue at the rate of 0.59% per annum, for all of which judgment and execution may issue. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/3/09. (mkf)
|
|
Filing
9
OPINION AND ORDER granting pltf's motion 2 for preliminary injunction; defts are hereby preliminarily enjoined from disciplining any student who wears a band similar to pltf's Exhibit 13 around the wrist, and from using the events of October 6 as a factor in the progressive discipline of Chris Lowry, Colton Dougan, or Michael Joseph. No bond is required. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/20/06. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lowry et al v. Watson Chapel School District et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
