White v. Simmons et al
| Roderick White |
| Larry Bowler, Charlotte Green, Jonathon Simmons, Tommy James, David White, Venita King, Juanita Stell and Nnamdi Ifediora |
| 5:2007cv00079 |
| April 17, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| William R. Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 120 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Larry Bowler and Jonathon Simmons, dismissing the complaint against them with prejudice; Jury Trial scheduled for 12/1/09 is hereby cancelled; judgment will be entered dismissing this action in its entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on 10/14/09. (vjt)
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that separate Defts' 100 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in full; all claims against Defts White, James, King, Green, and Stell are dismissed; Pltf's claims against the three remaining Defts Simmons, Bo wler, and Ifediora re Pltf's medical classification and subsequent assignment to field utility duty are also dismissed; Pltf's deliberate indifference claims re his course of treatment will proceed against remaining Defts at this time; Venita King, Juanita Stell, David White, Charlotte Green and Tommy James terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on 3/18/09. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.