Miles v. Baker et al
Marlon D Miles |
Samuel Baker, Angela Lewis, Kim Luckett, Jesse Davis and Thomas Rowland |
5:2007cv00081 |
April 18, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
J. Leon Holmes |
H. David Young |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 ORDER adopting 94 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's 91 Motion for Contempt is DENIED, and Oscar Eve Jones IV is hereby appointed for the limited purpose of assisting Pltf in collecting the judgment he was awarded in this case; the Clerk is directed to send counsel a copy of this Order and a copy of Local Rule 83.7, and to forward a copy of the file 15 days after the entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/29/08. (vjt) |
Filing 94 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that pltf's motion for contempt be denied, and Oscar Eve Jones IV, of the Jones Law Firm, be appointed for the limited purpose of assisting pltf in collecting the judgment he was awarded in this case 91 . The Clerk sh ould enter Mr. Jones' name as the attorney of record for pltf, and should send counsel a copy of this order and a copy of LR 83.7. The Clerk should also be directed to forward counsel a copy of this file 15 days after the entry of the appointment order. Objections to R&R due by 12/24/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 12/10/2008. (lej) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.