Askew v. Hobbs et al
| Frank W Askew, Jr |
| Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelly, Steven Bischof, Sandra Stratton, Robert Scott, Snyder, Johnny Wilson, Fluker, Samuel Johnson, John Whaley, Darryl Golden and Grant Harris |
| 5:2008cv00094 |
| April 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Lincoln |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| H. David Young |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER adopting 51 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/17/08. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
51
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that pltf's complt be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with LR 5.5 (c)(2) 2 . The Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action be considered frivolous and not in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 11/14/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 10/31/2008. (lej)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING Partial Report and Recommendations 40 denying 29 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and denying 27 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/26/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
