Bennett v. Adams et al
| Larry Bennett |
| Ed Adams, Jackson, Musselwhite and Arnold |
| 5:2008cv00236 |
| August 26, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Jackson |
| Brian S. Miller |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 dismissing complaint with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, certifying that an ifp appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith and that this dismissal constitutes a "strike". Signed by Judge Bryan S. Miller on 10/22/08. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
7
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending 2 Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed, with prejudice, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; recommending the dismissal of this action constitute a strike as de fined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and recommending the Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order and Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 10/1/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/17/08. (hph)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
