Muldrow v. Adams et al
| Veotis Muldrow |
| Jackson, Ed Adams, Musselwhite and Arnold |
| 5:2008cv00237 |
| August 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Jefferson |
| Beth Deere |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 3 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's complaint 2 is DISMISSED with prejudice; this dismissal will count as a "strike" purs to 28 USC 1915(g); the Court certifies that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith; denying as moot Pltf's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; judgment will entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/15/08. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
3
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice. The Court recommends that this dismissal count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that the Court certify that an in forma pauperis ap peal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and not taken in good faith; and denying as moot 1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 9/16/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 09/02/08. (hph)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
