Haynes v. Norris

Plaintiff: Walter Haynes
Defendant: Larry B Norris
Case Number: 5:2008cv00248
Filed: September 4, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 17, 2009 11 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 10 Memorandum Order filed in this matter, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDGED that Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, so that Petitioner may seek to obtain authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive habeas petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/17/09. (hph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes v. Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry B Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?