Hooten v. Harris et al
Edward Joe Hooten |
Jonnie R Harris, Lillie Phillips Ward, Jesse M Davis and Mark Cashion |
5:2008cv00274 |
October 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
Hot Spring |
Jerry W. Cavaneau |
James M. Moody |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 JUDGMENT in favor of Lillie Phillips Ward against Edward Joe Hooten re 29 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations dismissing complaint with prejudice and denying relief sought. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/4/09. (bkp) |
Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that defts' motion for summary judgment be granted and pltf's complt be dismissed with prejudice 17 . The Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 4/29/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 4/15/2009. (lej) |
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING 5 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's claims against defts Harris, Davis and Cashion; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for deft Ward and the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the complaint with attachments, a copy of the recommendations, and a summons upon deft through the Compliance Division of the ADC without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/4/08. (bkp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.