McCraney v. Efird et al
Vernist McCraney |
Connie Efird, Robert Scott, Lagrone and Cashion |
5:2008cv00301 |
November 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
Chicot |
William R. Wilson |
H. David Young |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER adopting 81 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, the Defts' Motions for Summary Judgment 65 68 are GRANTED, and Pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/17/09. (vjt) |
Filing 81 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the motions for summary judgment filed by deft Robert Scott and defts Connie Efird, Clayton Lagrone, and Mark Cashion be granted, and pltf's complt be dismissed without prejudice 65 68 . The Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Objections to R&R due no later than eleven days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 10/30/2009. (lej) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss; Adopting 19 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 1/26/09. (mkf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.