Hawthone v. Arkansas, State of et al
Johnnie Ray Hawthone |
Arkansas, State of and Larry Norris |
5:2009cv00193 |
July 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Chicot |
Brian S. Miller |
J. Thomas Ray |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER denying 7 14 Motions for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/13/09. (mkf) |
Filing 9 ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendations, re 2 The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, so that Petitioner may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive habeas petition. DENYING AS MOOT 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/10/09. (dac) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that 1 Petitioner's MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied, as moot; and recommending that the 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed, without prejudice, so that Petitioner may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive habeas petition. Objections to R&R due by 8/24/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 8/10/09. (hph) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.