Herman v. Potts

Plaintiff: Antonio Herman
Defendant: Susan Potts
Case Number: 5:2009cv00301
Filed: September 23, 2009
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Hot Spring
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: Henry L. Jones
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 29, 2011 37 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Susan Potts against Antonio Herman re 36 Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 3/29/11. (kpr)
February 28, 2011 30 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing plaintiff to file a response to deft's 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/28/11. (kpr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Herman v. Potts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Herman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Potts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?